1/ I read Farrow (2015) Open education and critical pedagogy http://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2016.1113991 #5Papers
2/ This theoretical work explored elements of open education and critical pedagogy, given neither term has fixed, stable meanings
3/ Digitization of learning resources and internet technologies shift learning possibilities for students, institutions, and corporate ventures alike
4/ Models for open education disrupt learning frames, with those who capitalize on them having new areas of opportunity
5/ Critical pedagogy has disputed notions of emancipation critique and its oppressiveness in education
6/ The shifting nature of openness presents new opportunities for theory, research, and most importantly practice
7/ Glad to see references to @gsiemens @oldaily #ds106 and various #moocmooc. I think #rhizo16 may extend these notions
8/ I wonder if readers agree the ‘bazaar’ model of open education is more democratic and engaging; perhaps depends on how defined?
These are the questions that I use to guide my summary:
- Reference to the Article
- What attracted me to this Article?
- What is it about (Problem / Purpose / Research Questions)?
- Where does this come from (Literature / Theoretical Framework)?
- What did they do (Methodology & Method)?
- What did they learn (Results / Discussion)?
- What did I learn?
To see more about what I am attempting to do with Research Summaries, see my #5Papers page or check out my other ones here.
Any feedback, thoughts, ideas, or suggestions are appreciated!