data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c4493/c4493dcdc12b6943829aad292afd090e491a2587" alt="station-839208_1920"
1/ I read Beckstead (2015) Cultural objects in a transforming world http://doi.org/10.1177/1354067X14551300 for #5Papers today
2/ This theoretical work takes a psychological approach to groups through an #Actor-Network Theory frame #ANTheory
3/ #Actor-Network Theory posits groups and society is not static, but always maintaining itself and its parts
4/ This is a challenge when social groups have spokespeople who speak on behalf of a community
5/ While groups are comprised of associations between people and non-human elements, all with agency
6/ Networks of humans and non-human actors together blur distinctions between actors and the network
7/ People within groups do not develop ties to one another in isolation, but only through non-human actors in their networks
8/ Change and maintenance of groups happens not only by the various actors alone, but by the networks themselves
9/ While a theoretical work, human and non-human actors appear to stabilize networks while never being static on their own
10/ This is a useful conception of #Actor-Network Theory as it is fairly jargon-free with implications for cultures themselves
The next work will be Swan, J., Scarbrough, H., & Ziebro, M. (2015). Liminal roles as a source of creative agency in management: The case of knowledge-sharing communities. Human Relations. http://doi.org/10.1177/0018726715599585
Cultural Objects in a Transforming World: An #Actor-Network Article Summary #5Papers… https://t.co/ZoO86RPwG7 https://t.co/VtOhpkv7ql
I realize I did not post these as Tweets yesterday, so will post them as a series today, too.
I somehow did not post my #5Papers elements yesterday, so here they are https://t.co/cRqpjCf0T2