@chrisrjones @tryberg @cristinacost Juicy stuff! Pushing the envelope, is it necessary somebody declare these discussions here are public?
Director of Training & Knowledge Management + Educational Researcher + Professor + Poet + Wikipedian = Liminality + Actor-Network Theory + Open Education
@JeffreyKeefer @chrisrjones @tryberg and that they may be used for research purposes. 🙂
@cristinacost @JeffreyKeefer @chrisrjones @tryberg Also, ‘innocent’ data now may compromise participant later. Is it ethical to use it?
@PatParslow @JeffreyKeefer @chrisrjones @tryberg I think we still need to seek informed consent from the content producer.
@PatParslow @JeffreyKeefer @chrisrjones @tryberg analogy:just ’cause individual’s house/garden/car(u name it) is open,R u entitled 2 go in?
@cristinacost @JeffreyKeefer @chrisrjones @tryberg Absolutely & perhaps also need to anonymise content as well as the ‘who’ (searchability)
@cristinacost @JeffreyKeefer @chrisrjones @tryberg Quite, there should be an assumption of required privacy, imho.
@PatParslow @JeffreyKeefer @chrisrjones @tryberg if content is searchable it may be quite hard to anonymise without losing meaning,but agree
@cristinacost @JeffreyKeefer @chrisrjones @tryberg Need ways of modifying without losing meaning; but yes, hard.