Daily Digest for May 4th

twitter (feed #2)
@REVOLP Expecting no discussion or dissent and demanding confidentiality does not account for constructionist learning or later processing. [jeffreykeefer]
twitter (feed #2)
RT @Fifino9: @JeffreyKeefer Sounds you had an interesting day. Honesty and dissent in learning situations – I think a subject worth explor… [jeffreykeefer]
twitter (feed #2)
@NancyReyesNYC I rarely do things for their own sake. This point in my life, if I don’t try to follow my beliefs, what hope is there for me? [jeffreykeefer]
twitter (feed #2)
@lizgloyn I am not sure. Let’s face it, a group of educators naturally discusses and processes experiences to debrief and learn. . [jeffreykeefer]
twitter (feed #2)
@lizgloyn Per the statement on confidentiality, that should now not happen. Am I really to believe nobody will talk about this on Monday? [jeffreykeefer]
twitter (feed #2)
@stevewright1976 I don’t know. What I do know us that by signing it as written means I would not have had this rich discussion here. [jeffreykeefer]
twitter (feed #2)
@Notorious_QRG I am not sure, but one of the facilitators seemed to believe the course could not proceed without all consenting. I could not [jeffreykeefer]
twitter (feed #2)
RT @AlisonSeaman: @JeffreyKeefer some of the best learning I’ve had came from learning what *not* to do. [jeffreykeefer]
twitter (feed #2)
@AlisonSeaman Perhaps some of my experiences may help others to consider these often un- or under-stated mores on teaching and learning. [jeffreykeefer]
twitter (feed #2)
@REVOLP Interestingly, this is part of a huge grant. I wonder about the implications? However, confidentiality means they cannot debrief! [jeffreykeefer]
twitter (feed #2)
@REVOLP I said it to the project person when I left. This confidentiality means it should not be discussed with the grant PI. Unrealistic?! [jeffreykeefer]
twitter (feed #2)
@Notorious_QRG Consent away all our rights and then the legal people will really show us the implications. [jeffreykeefer]
twitter (feed #2)
RT @Notorious_QRG: @JeffreyKeefer its interesting because ‘consent’ sounds like individual empowerment but often isn’t. [jeffreykeefer]
twitter (feed #2)
RT @REVOLP: @JeffreyKeefer Strings attached knowledge ? Is it knowledge? Lol [jeffreykeefer]
twitter (feed #2)
@REVOLP Lots of strings attached to learning. Perhaps that learning in itself is a most valuable experience? [jeffreykeefer]
twitter (feed #2)
Interestingly, the facilitators recorded the session even though I was the sole voice not giving consent. Does not sound like respect to me. [jeffreykeefer]
twitter (feed #2)
Nothing like destroying their credibility while claiming respect and transparency. Perhaps the issue was they were not prepared for dissent? [jeffreykeefer]
twitter (feed #2)
@profology @VCVaileNFM @Fassreifen Great! Choose the days that work for you and we’ll get that settled on Monday #AdjunctChat [jeffreykeefer]
twitter (feed #2)
@peoplegogy Happy to help! You have my email? Let me know what criteria to review against. [jeffreykeefer]
twitter (feed #2)
RT @NeinQuarterly: Foucault and the panopticon walk into a bar. Nobody notices. [jeffreykeefer]
twitter (feed #2)
@peoplegogy Sounds great! [jeffreykeefer]
twitter (feed #2)
RT @sgwarnog: Phenomenal *Threshold Concepts* bibliography – themed by discipline: http://t.co/WBmviDytGS #highered #eddev #HE [jeffreykeefer]
twitter (feed #2)
@raulpacheco Just keep telling yourself . . . lots of miles! [jeffreykeefer]
twitter (feed #2)
@raulpacheco Is it still the next day in Tokyo? [jeffreykeefer]
twitter (feed #2)
Got any ideas to share with other #adjuncts? Perhaps you need that support yourself? #AdjunctChat http://t.co/ipbHlJOeMw [jeffreykeefer]

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.