Director of Training & Knowledge Management + Educational Researcher + Professor + Poet + Wikipedian = Liminality + Actor-Network Theory + Open Education
@NSRiazat I used narrative inquiry. I used grounde…
@NSRiazat I used narrative inquiry. I used grounded theory in earlier research, however, and found Charmaz preferable to the others #phdchat
6 thoughts on “@NSRiazat I used narrative inquiry. I used grounde…”
RT @JeffreyKeefer: @NSRiazat I used narrative inquiry. I used grounded theory in earlier research, however, and found Charmaz preferable …
@JeffreyKeefer @NSRiazat- I am using #groundedtheory too for my current research project.
@JeffreyKeefer @nsriazat Charmaz is so readable & makes sense! Good reference for narrative inquiry? (Tho I am all mixed mtds these days.)
@one_wyz_womn @JeffreyKeefer @bprerna – found Charmaz easier to make sense of than Strauss and Corbin at times. Prefer Glaserian stance.
@NSRiazat @jeffreykeefer @bprerna agreed. Strauss & Corbin a bit philosophically heavy, Glaser more flexible & “realistic” I think.
@NSRiazat @one_wyz_womn @JeffreyKeefer Yeah, I prefer Glaserian approach to Grounded Theory as well. It focuses less on line by line coding
RT @JeffreyKeefer: @NSRiazat I used narrative inquiry. I used grounded theory in earlier research, however, and found Charmaz preferable …
@JeffreyKeefer @NSRiazat- I am using #groundedtheory too for my current research project.
@JeffreyKeefer @nsriazat Charmaz is so readable & makes sense! Good reference for narrative inquiry? (Tho I am all mixed mtds these days.)
@one_wyz_womn @JeffreyKeefer @bprerna – found Charmaz easier to make sense of than Strauss and Corbin at times. Prefer Glaserian stance.
@NSRiazat @jeffreykeefer @bprerna agreed. Strauss & Corbin a bit philosophically heavy, Glaser more flexible & “realistic” I think.
@NSRiazat @one_wyz_womn @JeffreyKeefer Yeah, I prefer Glaserian approach to Grounded Theory as well. It focuses less on line by line coding