Still reading the Cook and Brown (1999) Bridging epistemologies article from yeseterday. Would have gotten it completed today (even though I taught at Pace University in the Doctor of Nursing Practice Program today, where I am co-teaching NURS 840: Teaching and Learning in Advanced Practice Nursing), but I had a request for more revisions for an article that is scheduled to be published later this year. The problem—the revisions are a RUSH, and due by Sunday.
Farewell weekend 🙁
Anyway, one of the items in Cook and Brown is their assessment of interaction with the social and physical worlds comes from Jose Ortega y Gasset, one of many great thinkers I have never read (though I did just order his book of essays, History as a System, after the authors made several references to it). I was particularly touched with this:
Ortega abandoned the frame of the abstracted, analytic thinking self and throughout his work approached questions of epistemology, action, etc. from the perspective of ‘myself within this context.” For Ortega, what we can know and what we can do are not discoverable through an abstract Cartesian though experiment, but are products of ongoing concrete interaction between “myself” (or “ourselves”) and the specifics of the social and physical “context” or “circumstances” we are in at any given time (p. 389).
I really like the emphasis on the individual bringing meaning to this or that experience based on the context, and while this is generally considered American Pragmatism, I am now wondering if pragmatism is merely another frame of constructivism, just captured in time? In another way, is pragmatism an episode of constructivism?
Quote interesting this writing about my doctoral studies each day . . .
5 thoughts on “Ortega y Gasset and Pragmatism as an Episode of Constructivism”
Read Ken Gergen for social constructionism and Rorty for American pragmatism.
Thank you, Kip. I have read some of Rorty, though I am not very familiar with Gergen. Can you recommend something in particular in which to begin from them?
Rorty in Hiley, D.R., Bohman, J.F., Shusterman, R. (1991) The Interpretive Turn Philosophy, Science, Culture. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press.
Gergen: easiest to look at his downloadable papers on his website:
Thank you for the references; it looks like yet again I have a lot of reading ahead of me. The first one is long since out of print, so off to the library I go!