I have intentionally selected a different strategy of inquiry for each of our modules, having moved from case study to narrative inquiry to ethnography and now to grounded theory, based on Kathy Charmaz’s work. I recently attended a workshop that Kathy offered, as I had previously heard how this can be a rather involved and complicated process. I thought I understood it, until I tried my hand at it. As I imagined, I did need a computer assisted qualitative data analysis software (CAQDAS) application to manage all the data that I generated (who would have ever thought I would drown in data of only 3 people?), so purchased and learned MAXQDA, one of the programs that people commonly use to handle and manage large amounts of data. I found the program a life-saver, as I never would have been able to do the 2 levels of coding that then I used to proceed to theoretical sampling, ultimately learning something that I did not expect to find at all.
Perhaps that is one of the benefits of grounded theory; I started with the text and was open to anything I found along the way, upon which I would ground (or build) my theory, without having some things in mind I was hoping (or even not hoping) to find.
I am still finding my way around Grounded Theory but I came across Situational Analysis by accident. Currently exploring it, reading Clarke (Situational analysis: grounded theory after the postmodern turn).
@wlonline
You know, I have that text though have not yet gotten to it. Interested to hear your assessment when you are finished with or otherwise try Clarke’s work.
Thank you for the comment!
Jeffrey
Will try! Am still “wayfinding”. And I look forward to following your progress with grounded theory.
@wlonline
Wonderful! I am hoping to take that grounded theory research and work that up into an article. Will let you know how it progresses!
Jeffrey