Laura L. Bierema and Julia Storburg-Walker
They introduced themselves, and ised PowerPoints
They are committed feminists, and are frustrated that in the HRD world is a little incomplete and thinks that HRED is being coopeted by a paradigm hegemonic dynamics
systems thinking, psycology, and ethics according to Swanson — they think is a little incomokete
HRD is also dominated by women, but it is the masculine and white males who lead the field and make more money and really lead the field. Julia spoke about how Laura helped Julia become more of a feminist thinker. As she is not tenured, she has to speak differently than Laura, who is.
Thet traced the masculine roots of HRD and how, in the 1920’s there was the change from
INterested that this women was not heard since she was not given a voice.
They did a text analysis to see how language was used in classic management texts. The framework is menist po-structuralist and post-modernist
Alvesson and Deetz (2000) is what they used to build upon. Bradshaw 1996 - methodology of deconstruction with categories, dichotomies, and false oppositions
They perpetuate the status quo with the pitting against of opposites and dicotomies between critical theorists and those who are more practical. The binaries are taught that there is performance and there is learning, not both
They mentioned Rothberger in 1949 and then in 1965 HBR classic of the manager. They identified some of the more important work, and then closely read the text and had conversations about how they undertsood the text, and then used the Holt and Swanson textbook
how the text creates these false bunaries, and how they power is or is not being dealth with, such as using a false dichomy and harmonious song that performance is the dominant piint, and then criticizes anybody who sees this in another way as being naive (Swanson etxt). Are critical of women, people of color, and non-management. This can be seen as the onecept of inleasing human performance. They use “quotations” in deconstruction as side lanuage in a text.
Bradshw used a post-structural analysis methodology
This paper is simiilar to the one they presented at the AHRD conference in 2007. The audience here is probabably more open to their message, though they also probably have less of an orietnaiton in the HRD field. in AHRD, this is a similar issue
Biremea uses the Walton text instead of the Swanson text
The 3-legged stool of Swanson:
- econoimics
- psychology
- systems theory
thet want to take the stool and give it a feminist perspective for their next AHRD paper
their anslysis, theu make no claims to the truth, theyt are an interpretation and helps them to undertstand their work. This is their qualitative perspective. I thought this was an excellent point, in that they are not trying to state their perspective as being definite. Good qualitative research here.
They then discussed more about Rothlessburgger’s The Foreman. I recall this as being a review of and continuation of the paper they presented at last year’s conference, One of the points is that this is that management is objective and can “fix” the foreman.
HRD text gives 0 space to diversity, gender, sexuality, social responsibility, managerialism, racism
MY QUESTION - social responsibility (as not being in Swanson) is getting to be a big topic in the business schools as they can be shown as how companies are strategicly trying to show they are interested in being good corporate citizens. Is this just a marketing scheme or it this real proactive?
adult education is different from HRD — where the organization controls the learning process
Their book is that performance is the song, and as think such claims are flagrant expressions of masuline rationality
MY QUESTION — Why is that book so popular then?
They took an editorial Swanson gave in HRDQ - we should only be doing unisex resaerch . Bierema states that they have always done masculine research as the norm. This is the sense that feminist reseasrach will insert a bias, and from their post-structural research he is asusming their has never been a masuline bias in the research. Laura inserted this without Julia knowing it, since Swanson was Julia’s dissertation advisor
Recommendations — take gender into account when developing HRD research?
MY QUESTION - My perception is that men find it threatening whenever gender issues are raised, since that seems to feed into Swanson’s concern. What strategies can be used to get around that so the issues can be raised without people (men) being threatened and turning off to the issues before they are even raised?
Then there was time for questions. I wonder why the audience was so small for this conference, and he said they have to be aware of the binary elements they are bringing to this, since they are doing a post-structuralist work and may be hard to draw conclusions. hey are selecting these as wexamples, and while they may be fixed in the text as examples, they are posisbliy being used as examples.
They are having discussion about words and how they are used. Julia does not want to have words block
cultural () theory — there is a need to challenge the symbols, as they are all hegemonic. Also, HRD may have come along to silence those with issues, such as racial or sexist, by showing how perfomrance can be improved and oppresses workers.
Read the rest of this entry »