1
Feb

Twitter Admits Reliability Is Valuable?

   Posted by: Jeffrey Keefer   in Blogging, Communication, Technology

Did I read the last two posts on the Twitter blog correctly?

They stated “You may have noticed we had an outage last night/stretching into this morning,” but instead they should have admitted that their service in the past few days has been intermittent at best.

On the heels of this, they then began today’s post with “We have a stated goal to make Twitter a reliable global communication utility. ” Really? Are they serious?

They have to know their service glitches have been lampooned in the blogosphere, and their credibility has seriously eroded as being a reliable (aka business-able) communication and microblogging (liveblogging?) tool. Many of us have started to rely on Twitter as a communication tool (via Web, BlackBerry, a whole host of applications, etc.), using it from everything from liveblogging to self-marketing and branding.

I know whenever I tell colleagues and friends about Twitter, the platform sounds so silly until I show people how it works and how I use it. Now, I really love Twitter. I like how my Tweets get archived daily on my own blog. How I am able to join a new organization and suddenly begin to have other people interested in reading my daily Twitter musings.

I really hope Twitter becomes more reliable. While this all this costs money, is there enough financing coming in to create and maintain the very reliability we all expect? 

Tags: ,

This entry was posted on Friday, February 1st, 2008 at 5:15 pm and is filed under Blogging, Communication, Technology. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

One Trackback/Ping

  1. contentious.com - links for 2008-02-03    Feb 03 2008 / 11am:

    [...] Silence and Voice » Blog Archive » Twitter Admits Reliability Is Valuable? “Twitter began today’s post with “We have a stated goal to make Twitter a reliable global communication utility. ” Really? Are they serious?” (tags: microblogging reliability credibility problems) [...]

Leave a reply

Name (*)
Mail (will not be published) (*)
URI
Comment