Rob Poell, Tilburg University

They compared research data from both Dutch and US perspectives from what the data are saying from two different angles.

He spoke about actors within an organization, and the theories of learning processes,policies, and programs that lead to content structures, organizational structures, and learning climate.

The four ideal types inlcude:

  1. liberal-contractual
  2. vertical-regulated
  3. horizontal-organic
  4. external-collegiate

This is also called the Actor Network Perspective

Critical-Pragmatist Perspective — four ways in which act action-learning projects can take place

Tacit School

Scientific School (people reflect in order to solve problems)

Experiential School (reflection on individual action)

Critical Reflection school (reflection on norms and values, such as double-loop learning)

They was a re-analysis study of previously-recorded research — four Dutch cases and four American cases that were compared.

I was a little confused as to why this comparison was done as a research project. I am not clear as to the “so what?” factor with this research. The discussion of the Findings were interesting, but I was not clear as to what to do with them.

Ahh, the Relevance slide — one really good point is about theory triangulation, where “using more lenses generates better insights in data.” This is a really good point.

Technorati Tags: ,

This entry was posted on Thursday, June 28th, 2007 at 3:07 pm and is filed under Academia, Liveblogging, Liveblogging AHRDOxford2007, Research. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

Leave a reply

Name (*)
Mail (will not be published) (*)
URI
Comment