I am working on my review of Personal Democarcy Forum using the easy to use Confabb tool. The organizers sent an email requesting reviews of the session a week ago (on 5/22), and now, a week later, there have not been many responses.
I wonder if that is because we are all busy people and life gets in the way, or if it is in any way reflective of the conference or the evaluation strategy itself? I wish there would have been some reaction evaluation immediately at the end of the conference, such as a Kirkpatrick Level 1 Evaluation, so more would have been captured right away. I know I need time to process this, so I have been going back to the site several times since the conference. However, I think that out of site may mean out of mind for others, and without attendees providing some feedback and evaluation, it may be difficult for the conference to improve based on the suggestions and recommendations of the participants. As I thought this conference was an eye-opener, I hope others take the time to add their voices to the feedback on the website.

Technorati Tags: personal democracy forum, pdf2007