Michel FoucaultI have been working on a paper about some of the high-level philosophical thoughts of Michel Foucault and Herbert Marcuse. Foucault’s concept of discipline and
punishment, in light of power residing within a judge of normality, and Marcuse’s work of repressive tolerance and how tolerance often represses diversity rather than increases and supports it.

Both of these thinkers have struck me recently, and I am now just trying to understand them enough to be able to explain their contributions. Herbert MarcuseI have read some of both of their works, and will have to read and re-read them more, since on the surface
they are both easy, yet their words in fact challenge much of our contemporary  society. 

Technorati Tags: ,

This entry was posted on Tuesday, May 15th, 2007 at 11:02 pm and is filed under Learning & Teaching, Philosophy, Power & Positionality, Research. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

2 comments so far

 1 

There will be many sleepless nights. I recommend a good cup of coffee and always re-evaluate their assertions. It is not only the thoughts that counts this time around but the honest to goodness application.

“Nothingness” is a beginning as we are all shackled by our upbringing… hippies aside!!

May 20th, 2007 at 9:13 pm
 2 

Value judgement is important especially when easy says are not easily lived. Philo speak is not detached from socio-economic situations i.e. moments in time and therefore need to be re-evaluated for its sense of purpose (impetus). The hard part is its universal application vs. new emerging sources such as the rise of 3rd world countries like India and China and how this will shape our perception moving forward….

Good Luck.
Hadi

May 20th, 2007 at 9:58 pm

Leave a reply

Name (*)
Mail (will not be published) (*)
URI
Comment