So, there has been a lot of discussion about the bullying policy regarding the Kathy Sierra situation, and it seems to be dying down now. Now that she is back to blogging to some extent, and others, like Tim O'Reilly, are considering a code of conduct. I am amazed how much anger there seems to be about it. So much discussion about censorship on his post, almost like people want an anything goes frontier. I suspect many people censor their comments and do not allow anonymous posts or those that are almost savage in their language, but I am surprised there is seemingly so much anger about this.

I wonder if blog users think anonymous bullying is ok?

Granted, those who engage in the hate and anonymous behavior may want to hide behind their words or fake names or whatever else to be somebody else online (like perhaps Second Life?), but those who would want to do this behavior would never sport such a a badge. Perhaps blogging is like porn or illegal drugs or discreet sex or smoking or drinking–people want them but do not always want to readily admit that they engage in them. What I learned in all this, isthat this issue has really touched a nerve, so I am sure that we are not hearing the end of it.

This entry was posted on Monday, April 16th, 2007 at 8:44 pm and is filed under Technology. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

One comment

 1 

I indicated a 10 factor starting point in one of my postings regarding this because I too think that some parameters without silencing one’s voice is important as I think that the blogosphere is actually one step towards developing a global citizenry. Wouldn’t it be great to just be called Citizens of Earth rather than countries (or even provinces) that borders us and our ability to really learn from each other?

April 18th, 2007 at 11:32 pm

Leave a reply

Name (*)
Mail (will not be published) (*)
URI
Comment