1/ I read Hara & Sanfilippo (2016) Co-constructing controversy: Content analysis of collaborative knowledge negotiation in online communities http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2016.1142595 #5Papers
2/ This study explored a social construction of knowledge in online environments
3/ They asked “How do ordinary citizens make sense of contested scientific knowledge in online communities?”
4/ Online knowledge collaboration seems to involve sharing existing knowledge (knowledge reuse) and collaborative knowledge creation site
5/ This study focused around 3 online communities discussing the Measles, Mumps, and Rubella (MMR) vaccine and previous faulty science myths
6/ The authors did a content analysis of postings in this area and coded the results (great example of qualitative code use in practice!)
7/ The researchers identified 4 content categories–editorial, knowledge components, knowledge scaffolding, and vandalism. Useful for future studies.
8/ The examples the researchers shared with the limits of their research were excellent examples for how to acknowledge them
9/ I am unclear why the authors talked about the statistical significance of their qualitative findings, but a minor point in the wider methodology
Interested in learning more about this approach to #5Papers and the related article summaries? See here.